UPIU Espanol
Join UPIU - Register Now! Login
Header_logo_lg
Beta

Connecting People One Story at a Time

Ad_arrow 728x90-upiu

China's Tibet policy: protection or power play?

Published_upi
EmailEmail
Spread the word.
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Digg It
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmark
Back
Image 1 of 4
Forward
Harry_wu_large_square
Harry Wu (Laogai Research Foundation)

China's regulation of Tibetan Buddhism is stoking a heated controversy among specialists, with some suspecting Beijing of a power play in disguise.

One skeptic is Harry Wu, founder of the Laogai Research Foundation. Wu's 19-year confinement in China's laogai prison camps has driven him to a lifelong human rights campaign for those he says have been abused by the Chinese government.

"It is an individual story but you have to know there are 40 (million)-50 million people that were in the labor camps," Wu said in a phone interview. "In Germany, if you were Jewish, you went to the camps. But in Communist China, you went to the camps because you were a capitalist or a landowner."

As a close friend of Tibet's religious leader the Dalai Lama, Wu resents the regulation of Tibetan Buddhism. Most recently, he has spoken against what he says is China's kidnapping of Tibetan Buddhist leaders and the establishment of its own, more sympathetic leaders.

The regulation of Tibetan Buddhism is one of countless ways the Chinese government has abused the Tibetan people since the Dalai Lama's exile, said Lee Edwards, a distinguished fellow at the Heritage Foundation.

“Over the last five decades, those who resisted Chinese control have been killed or sent to labor camps; monasteries have been looted and destroyed; Tibetans have been placed in communes and their basic rights routinely violated," Edwards said at a recent Heritage event on the future of Tibet. "It’s been estimated that the number of Tibetans that have been killed, imprisoned, tortured or starved under Chinese rule is as high as 800,000."

The conflict has centered mainly on Tibet's two most important leaders. The Dalai Lama traditionally is both the spiritual and political head of the Tibetan people. During the 1959 Tibetan uprising against Chinese rule, he fled to sanctuary in India and has lived there since.

The Panchen Lama, while subordinate to the Dalai Lama, is responsible for identifying the leader’s reincarnation. But the Chinese government placed the young Tibetan-designated Panchen Lama into what it termed protective custody and then assigned that title to another child.

Recently, the Dalai Lama announced that he will not reincarnate in a Chinese-occupied Tibet. He has said that he might even choose the person in which he will reincarnate, something that has never been done before. He has also raised the possibility of breaking custom by choosing to reincarnate in someone who is female.

China’s State Administration for Religious Affairs has responded to the Dalai Lama's announcements by imposing regulations on his reincarnation, a move they say will protect the purity and effectiveness of Tibetan Buddhism. Still, Wu says the holding of the Panchen Lama is a sign that the Chinese government is out to destroy the Tibetan people.

The Chinese government, however, says it wants to protect the special interests of the religion, not destroy it.

"In order to comply with the people's wishes, and to ensure the regular order and healthy development of Tibetan Buddhism, the State Council issued regulations," said Ye Xiaowen, head of the State Administration of Religious Affairs, answering a question from the German newsmagazine Der Spiegel.

Wu scoffed at that assertion, saying that China’s rulers “are not into religion; (they) are Communists.”

Mary Beth Markey, vice president for advocacy at the International Campaign for Tibet, said the answer lies in control.

“The Chinese Communist Party anticipates that they will be able to take control of the reincarnation process and find a candidate that they can school and groom and turn into a patriotic Lama," Markey said. "Hence they will no longer have conflict because they will have someone they have molded into adopting the policies and priorities of the Beijing government.”

Other human rights specialists agree. John Roberts, an international political consultant in the Reagan White House, said the Chinese government’s intervention in Tibet is a ploy to create a religious schism. Then, he said, it will be easier for China to change the ideology of the Tibetan people to that of the Chinese Communist Party.

Wu, however, sees a more sinister motive in Beijing's policies.

"They are destroying the Tibetans, destroying their religion, destroying their independence. It's simple,” Wu said. “Why do the Tibetans need them? They have their own religion."

Leave a Comment (6)

Average Rating
  • Currently 2.8/5 Stars.
My Rating
  • Currently 0.0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Spread the word.
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Digg It
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmark
EmailEmail

6 Comments

log in to flag a comment
Anonymous_small

Kathleen Hwang said (8 months ago)

This story is well written with good quotes and interesting information. A couple of points could be better clarified, however. One is the relationship between the laogai camps and the Tibetan monks. Wu is not Tibetan; he only mentions landlords and capitalists in the camps, so the story needs to explain that monks were also sent to these labor camps. Also, the story mentions Chinese regulations concerning reincarnation, but does not explain what these regulations are. It is such an ironic point -- an atheist government thinking it can control a spiritual process -- that it deserves more emphasis. Overall this is a good piece, however.

Reply
log in to flag a comment
Harumi_small

Harumi Gondo said (8 months ago)

UPIU Mentor

Good job, Shanley! Well-written!

Reply
log in to flag a comment
Anonymous_small

John Roberts said (8 months ago)

I agree with Harumi -- good job, Shanley. It's a complex topic. For Kathleen, the regulations in question are Order No. 5. The contents of the order are reprinted in part in our newly-published book, "Freeing Tibet: 50 Years of Struggle, Resilience, and Hope." We also go into detail on how the Chinese regime will try to game the succession of the Dalai Lama and create schisms within Tibetan Buddhism. For instance, imagine a future in which China recognizes an "official" Dalai Lama while the Tibetans recognize a different Dalai Lama. Human rights groups will keep up pressure for world leaders to meet with the real Dalai Lama, while China will oppose such meetings. World leaders under pressure between economic interests and human rights interests can appease China by refusing to meet the real Dalai Lama, and instead meeting with the Chinese-designated Dalai Lama. This is how Nicholas Skarkozy or Gordon Brown or Barack Obama could get off the hook with Tibetan activists.....of course the Tibetan people will never accept the Chinese choosing the Dalai Lama. But the Chinese regime will try. Unless, perhaps, China's people prove to be as brave as Iran's in insisting on real elections and fair results. You can see more about this on our website, www.FreeingTibet.com.

Reply
log in to flag a comment
6a00d8341d255953ef0105364b764a970c_small

Greg Perreault said (8 months ago)

Nice symbolic detail lede. Great story, but I suppose you've heard from me enough to know why I like it. ;-)

Reply
log in to flag a comment
Photo2_small

SarahMarie Harman said (8 months ago)

Great story, Shanley! Your use of detail makes it a very compelling read....

Reply
log in to flag a comment
Anonymous_small

Matthew Collins said (8 months ago)

Very good article. Out of curiosity, how does the Chinese government's handling of Tibetans compare with their handling of Muslim Uighurs?

Reply

Save yourself some effort! Login or register to comment! Or, sign-in super fast with your Facebook account...

300x250-upiu
Privacy Policy  |   Terms of Use  |   Flagging Policy  |   Support  |   About UPIU  |   FAQ  |   Visit UPI.com
© 2010 UPIU. All Rights Reserved.
Any views, information and/or other content expressed or made available by any UPIU.com contributor are those of the respective contributor and are not those of UPIU.com or UPI. Please see UPIU.com's Content Disclaimer for more information.