Any views, information and/or other content expressed or made available by any UPIU.com contributor are those of the respective contributor and are not those of UPIU.com or UPI. Please see UPIU.com's Content Disclaimer for more information.
Join UPIU - Register now! Log in
Header_logo_lg
Beta

Connecting People One Story at a Time

Twitter babble

EmailEmail
Spread the word.
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Digg It
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmark
Back
Image 1 of 2
Forward
06102009201_large_square
Nishath Nizar, a Twitter user going through tweets ()

The way Twitter has grabbed the attention of populace in a short span of time since it was founded in 2006 is amazing. It got its five billionth post this week. An interactive site, ranked 13 by web information company Alexa, it gives a lot of space to its users to express themselves through micro-blogging. However, notwithstanding its utility and prominence, it is being labelled as a “non-serious” stuff.

In a study by a market research firm, Pear Analytics, 41% of about 3,000,000 daily postings on Twitter are just “babble”. It’s an enormous amount considering the fact that Twitter users are concentrated mostly in US, UK and few other countries.

Nishath Nizar, an active Twitter user, agrees with the finding. “I use Twitter because everyone is on Twitter.” Did he ever read or respond to Deputy External Affairs Minister Shashi Tharoor, celebrated, and perhaps most controversial, twitter user from India? “No! never. As I said I’m on it just because everyone else is on it,” Nizar adds.

“Twitter is a temporary phenomenon which will fade out soon. See the kind of postings it’s getting of late,” says Abhay Shankar, a Sociology scholar in Jamia Millia Islamia University, New Delhi. “It was a part of the initial revolution which Web 2.0 brought in. And the media hype sustained it,” he adds.

Mizaj Mammu, a graduate student of Applied Psychology in Delhi University, disagrees. “Just see the growth rate of Twitter and compare it with others’. It’s almost 1400 per cent a month, compared to 250 per cent of Facebook.” She adds, “Even if its 41 per cent postings are ‘babble’, it has served its purpose.”

If any tweeter (user) tweets (posts) on the site, its followers get that tweet through SMS and the post is updated at the website simultaneously. Referring to the extensive use of Twitter in the Iranian election crisis, Mammu adds further, “It’s quite an amazing and powerful concept of Citizen Journalism.”

Prof Devesh Pandey, who specialises in Development and Globalisation studies, thinks its popularity is due to its “only 140 character per posting.” He says, “People find it easier to read and write small and compact posts. So, whatever comes to their mind, its ‘tweeted’ by the easily available mean, say for example, SMS. In the process many posts are not ‘scholarly’ but somehow it shows how the Twitter has revolutionized the way people think, write and communicates.” With a smile he brings to notice he just used the word ‘tweeted’, past form of tweet.

Prof Pandey adds, “It’s a form of micro-blogging, but its effects are macro. Revolutions are taking place here, celebrities and fans are interacting through it. It’s even helping thieves know the where-about of master of their target home.”

Leave a comment (2)

Average rating
  • Currently 3.7/5 Stars.
My rating
  • Currently 0.0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Spread the word.
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Digg It
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmark
EmailEmail

2 Comments

log in to flag a comment
Harumi_small

Harumi Gondo said (10 months ago)

UPIU Mentor

A good effort, Neyaz. You have a good collection of quotes from a range of people: scholars and Twitter users and this article has potential to be a strong story with a few tweaks. I have some suggestions.
-First off, you should be careful with your grammar.
-UPI style uses the American system of punctuation, which always has periods and commas inside quotation marks: "only 140 characters per posting." AND "Obviously not," Nizar adds.
-There were a few jumps in logic: You started off by saying, "Just imagine the amount 1,230,000. It’s only 41% of the daily posting on Twitter." How is the number 1,230,000 related to 41% of daily postings? Also, you mentioned NIshath Nizar and Shashi Tharoor: is Nishath following Shashi on Twitter? You need to mention that. Be careful that you explain things fully instead of assuming that your reader will understand the context.
-Also, your first graf (paragraph), also called the lede, is the most important, second only to the headline, in capturing your reader's interest. You may want to start with something more interesting and attention-grabbing than "1,230,000."
-Careful with the use of profanity in your article as many sites, including UPIU and UPI caution against it.
-Pictures are always good in illustrating your article.
-And finally, a general suggestion: Why not make this article on Twittering in India? You mention that it is the most popular in the US, UK and other countries. How does Twitter fare in India? Is it popular? Who uses it? This would be a newsworthy article that has potential to grab a UPI byline.
Let me know if I can be of more help or if you'd like to dialogue on any of these points.

Reply
log in to flag a comment
Ted_iliff_upiu_002_small

Ted Iliff said (9 months ago)

Adding to Harumi's point, a story on how Twitter fits into Indian cultural patterns of interpersonal communication, or not, would be a very interesting approach. For example, is courting that normally would not be allowed in some communities, conducted secretly via Twitter?

Reply

Save yourself some effort! Login or register to comment! Or, sign-in super fast with your Facebook account...

Privacy policy  |   Terms of use  |   Flagging policy  |   Support  |   About UPIU  |   FAQs  |   Visit UPI.com
© 2010 UPIU. All Rights Reserved.
Any views, information and/or other content expressed or made available by any UPIU.com contributor are those of the respective contributor and are not those of UPIU.com or UPI. Please see UPIU.com's Content Disclaimer for more information.